Skip to main content

Trapped Within Sexism

(Trigger Warning)

“A rat in a maze is free to go anywhere, as long as it stays inside the maze,” (Atwood, p.165).
-The Handmaid's Tale

            When a rat is in a maze it believes it is free. It thinks because it can move around it is no longer in a cage, when in reality it is still trapped. Sexism has been a continuous maze in our society, and folks, it is still here. We are still holding up those elaborate walls to the kingdom patriarchy and just because we almost had a female president doesn’t mean woman are equal, it means women are just now being allowed to move around. Pharr (2001), “Sexism, that system by which women are kept subordinate to men, is kept in place by three powerful weapons designed to cause or threaten women with pain and loss,” (p. 143). These weapons include economics, violence, and homophobia, (Pharr, 2001).
Holding up Sexism
Keep wages, education, and training opportunities scarce and withhold adequate paying jobs with the excuse that women are just not capable of filling them. Reinforce the illusion of equality and scarcity, explain there simply just isn’t enough to go around.
             “Better never means better for everyone. It always means worse, for some,” (Atwood, p.211). 
-The Handmaid's Tale

“Blame the economic victim and keep the victim’s self-esteem low through invisibility and distortion within the media and education, (Pharr, 2001). Continue the threat of mental and physical violence lurking around every corner to keep fear in the back of her mind, and the conformation of dominance and superiority in his. Demand irony, and demand that a woman must protect herself from the violence of men, with a man of her own, and if she rejects this, label her as a refusal of man and normality, as inferior, a bitch, as abnormal, as a freak, as a lesbian. One prisoner to another. 


References
Atwood, M. (1985). New York: Anchor Books.

Pharr, S. (2001). Homophobia as a Weapon of Sexism. In Race, Class, and Gender in the United States (5th ed.,      pp. 143-152). New York: Worth.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Masculine Expectations

            Gender expectations are engraved in social relationships and institutions and they impact the way people understand each other and operate in society. According to Parker (2008) sex comes from biology and anatomy, whereas contemporary feminist theory usually sees gender as the constructed product of culture rather than the natural, inevitable product of biology and anatomy. Basically, sex is related to biology, and gender is related to cultural assignment and the individual’s choice and portrayal of masculine and feminine qualities.             “Masculinity is a gender process typically associated with the male sex that impacts gender relations and personal identities for individuals,” (Locke n.d.). Masculine traits can be exhibited by any sex or gender, but are most often attributed to men. “Conceptions of masculinity are often perpetuated through cultu...

Genderlect Styles

Have you ever had an argument, conflict, or miscommunication with a person of the opposite sex? Most likely you have, but have you ever considered the reason for these mishaps being a result of cross-cultural communication based on your differing genders? I definitely never considered this, until I learned about the communication theory of genderlect styles.             Men and women, although more similar than different, are still raised differently, treated differently, they act differently, think differently, and have different gendered experiences and expectations within society. So with this, it is not far off to say that men and women come from, and interact within two separate cultures. The term genderlect, according to Griffin et al. (2005), suggests that masculine and feminine styles of communication are best viewed as two distinct cultural dialects. In other words, when men and women communicate they do so cros...

Gender and Friendship

Have you, or one of your opposite-sex friends ever been in the friend zone and didn’t want to be?             “The friend zone refers to a situation where there is a mismatch in romantic feelings between two individuals. For example, sometimes this is a sexual attraction mismatch, where one person is interested in romance while the other wants to just be friends,”(Nicholson, 2013, p. 1). Why does the friend zone exist? Better yet, on a broader scale, the real question and purpose of this post is, can heterosexual men and women be strictly platonic friends?  According to Adrian Ward’s (2012) study, investing the capability of truly platonic opposite-sex friendships, “Two people can experience the exact same relationship in radically different ways,” (p. 2). The results of this study found large differences in how both men and women experience opposite-sex friendships. Men were found to be much more attracted to their fema...